To this ‘riddle wrapped in associate degree enigma, within a mystery’, i’d add another paradox: West Pakistan denies any Asian nationn forces crossed the road of management as a part of the surgical strikes India says it launched, however it’s in its custody associate degree Indian soldier. And India, that says it launched the strikes – however that has formally avoided voice communication whether or not the strikes concerned troopers crossing the LoC – insists the soldier in Pakistani custody crossed the LoC unknowingly. this case has created a delicious irony: the sole means for West Pakistan to stay to its stand that there was no Indian attack is to just accept the Indian claim – that the soldier so crossed over by mistake.
Four days when India’s sensational announcement concerning conducting surgical strikes, the sheer parsimony of its statement has allowed all styles of unproved and fanciful stories to swirl round the media.
To be clear, all that the Indian director general of military operations, Lt information Ranbir Singh, truly aforesaid on the record on Michaelmas is that surgical strikes were launched against terrorist launching pads across the road of management, inflicting “heavy casualties”. Since then, the sole alternative little bit of info place out on the record – by junior info minister Rajyavardhan Rathore – is that contrary to ‘sourced’ reports, no helicopters were wont to cross the LoC, which there have been no aerial strikes. On his half, however, the DGMO failed to mention the quantity of targets or the quantity of casualties, nor did he establish them. Nor were any details provided of what the surgical strikes consisted of – whether or not U. S. Army Special Forces crossed over – because the Indian media has surmised, supported briefings from ‘sources’ WHO won’t press on the record – or whether or not standard targeted firing exploitation mortars was used.
No compromise to security
Why has the govt not formally free this harmless however necessary info within the public domain? One attainable reason is that the worry that the additional specific details it provides, the more durable it becomes for the Pakistani army to plausibly claim there have been no Indian strikes – therefore creating retributory action additional or less inevitable. however if that were the priority, what’s the rationale behind the planting of hyperbolic reports on the Indian media? for certain the govt is aware of this too can fuel the retributory impulse across the border.